Prescribe Respect

PUBLISHED ON  February 24, 2013

WRITTEN BY  Roni Zeiger

9 COMMENTS  Join the Discussion

SHARE THIS POST

I’ve been noticing recently that the most important thing I can do in clinic is listen respectfully and come up with a shared plan that feels like the patient owns it at least as much as I do.  When it goes well it almost feels like I’m handing out a prescription for respect.

Looking through this lens, I see respect as the critical currency in most of what we do, whether it’s doctoring, collaborating with colleagues, parenting, or teaching.

This year, our daughter’s 3rd grade teacher is probably the best elementary school teacher we’ve ever met.  One key to his success: every morning as the kids line up to enter the classroom, he individually looks every kid in the eye, shakes their hand, and genuinely asks them how they are doing, how was their weekend, or similar.  What does it mean for an 8 year old to have a respected grown man take them that seriously everyday?

When things aren’t going right with someone at work, or with my wife for that matter, it seems like it’s always a good idea to remember to ask myself: does the other person feel like they’re getting enough respect from me?  These relationships are obviously more complex than this, but I’m finding this simple framing helps me better understand others’ perspectives.

While I can’t prove it, I’m willing to bet that a prescription for metformin accompanied by an extra dose of respect results in better adherence and outcomes.  What does respect mean in this context?  This is definitely a work in progress, but I think it includes:

  • Introducing myself as “Roni Zeiger, one of the doctors here” instead of “Dr. Zeiger”, a tip I recently stole from Otis Brawley after reading his book, How We Do Harm
  • Asking the patient what he or she thinks is wrong; I explain that I find patients often know what’s wrong or their ideas provide useful clues
  • Explaining that the diagnosis and/or treatment we agree upon might be wrong and how we’ll learn that if that’s the case

In this context, respect means I’m interested in your perspective and it matters, we should collaborate, you are part of the solution.

Here’s to prescribing more respect and more sincere collaboration with patients.

The 5-95 Rule

PUBLISHED ON  January 28, 2013

WRITTEN BY  Roni Zeiger

2 COMMENTS  Join the Discussion

SHARE THIS POST

I’ve had a ridiculously fortunate life and career so far.  One of my “problems” is that there are too many interesting things to work on.  I’m developing an approach to this problem, which I call the 5-95 Rule.  It’s a work in progress, and I’d like to share it in case it’s helpful and selfishly to learn how it might be improved.

Assuming a long and healthy career, I expect there will be about 5 projects that will be THE things I work on.  These are the ones that have the highest potential impact and are most uniquely suited to my background in medicine, product development, and informatics.  My last such ‘project’ was my fabulous job at Google.  The current one is a startup company called Smart Patients (more on that another time).

I estimate that over the course of my career there will be another 95 projects where (a) the project could have important impact on the world and (b) I could significantly improve the project’s chance of success.  So, a career with 5 projects that I’ll work on full time, and 95 others — hence, the 5-95 rule.  I’ve developed a pretty good sense of how to choose the 5 and dedicate myself to them.  But how do I find the other 95 and what do I do about them?

I don’t think I’ll ever have a perfect answer, but I actively think about this now.  Why try to find them at all?  I’m an impact junkie and I love to learn.  I’ve also learned lessons about how critical focus is, so we’re talking about small, targeted commitments.  One might be a formal advisory role, another a lunch and a few emails.

Currently, I’m an advisor for three companies: Qpid.me, ShareTheVisit, and Hobnob, and I’m on the board of directors of a non-profit, Medic Mobile.  One not-very-humble principle guides me: if I’m a formal advisor for a company, I want to be their best advisor.  If I can’t be, that’s a signal that it might not be a good enough fit.

I love that I often get asked for informal advice.  If I don’t think I can help much, I’m not shy about saying so, sharing my quick thoughts, and wishing someone good luck.  Probably once a quarter, I have lunch with a  young entrepreneur.  I’m certain that much of the time, I learn much more than they do.  (Another discussion for later: I’m convinced that the only useful definition of expert, is that someone thinks you’re an expert. The rest is self-fulfilling.)

One of the many reasons for starting to blog again is to have an easy to find “contact me” page.  If you’re one of the 95, let me know!

Patient Friendly Orders

PUBLISHED ON  December 26, 2012

WRITTEN BY  Roni Zeiger

12 COMMENTS  Join the Discussion

SHARE THIS POST

Here’s another technically easy and culturally hard product: Patient Friendly Orders.  My version of this idea was born when I was admitted to the hospital for pneumonia about 5 years ago.  Even though I had previously worked in that hospital, the quality of communication about my care between the patient and the medical team was poor.  This got me thinking…

There should be a touchscreen by my bed that lists all the current doctors’ orders. They’re not hidden in the chart.  They’re not explained only in ephemeral conversations that occurred without me present.  Of course, if they’re in front of me, they’re going to have to get written in English.

Let’s organize the orders, too.  Imagine a loved one is hospitalized for a severe skin infection which also caused his diabetes to get way out of control.  He has difficulty sleeping in the hospital and also needs pain control.  All the orders — whether for diabetes, infection, sleep, or pain — are organized according to the problem they address.  (While doctors’ notes are generally organized by problem, their orders are not.  I bet if we implemented Patient Friendly Orders, they’d be useful for doctors if only just for this reason.)

When the doctor or nurse or physical therapist comes in, the patient and family can have a conversation about the current plan, with that plan laid out in front of them.  They make a shared decision, and the doctor can update the plan on the same touchscreen.  “Sounds like a plan,” the patient says while actually looking at it.  When you visit your loved one, he can show you the plan, too.  If a question comes up about a given order, or why something is missing from the plan, you can make a note on the touchscreen so the medical team knows to address it when they next come by.

What about all the loved ones who can’t be in the room, the patient’s broader community?  When I was in the hospital with pneumonia, for example, I wish I could have tweeted: “Switched from ceftriaxone plus doxycycline to zosyn. Does that make sense?”  This of course raises important questions.  Certainly, any such broadcast requires truly informed consent of the patient.  I don’t think such a tweet would violate my doctor’s privacy assuming I don’t mention him or her by name.  It would be fascinating to understand what a doctor might think: “Switching to zosyn — oh [bleep], what are they going to say on Twitter?”  Is that a bad thing?  I suspect the good would outweigh the bad.

But more important, it’s a conversation the patient and his or her loved ones must be allowed to have with their community.  Indeed, we’ve probably all been a part of conversations about whether someone we care about is getting the right care.  It’s just time the patient’s medical team and the patient’s community can be part of the same conversation.

Networks of Microexperts

PUBLISHED ON  December 17, 2012

WRITTEN BY  Roni Zeiger

18 COMMENTS  Join the Discussion

SHARE THIS POST

We’ve heard a lot about crowdsourcing, or outsourcing work that one person would normally do to a large and often distributed crowd.  There is a related and I think even more important idea of a network of microexperts and how they amplify the collective intelligence of their members.

Gilles Frydman — a pioneer of online patient communities and now my co-founder at Smart Patients — has developed this idea with me.  He has witnessed for over 15 years the power of cancer patient communities, each an organically grown network of microexperts.  Much of our recent thinking is inspired by Reinventing Discovery by Michael Nielsen.  He talks about the 1999 chess match of world chess champion Garry Kasparov versus “The World”, where anyone was allowed to be on the virtual World team and each move was decided by popular vote.  Remarkably, The World almost beat Kasparov.  No one on their team could consistently compete with Kasparov, though several happened to have a deep understanding of one of the configurations of the chess board during the match.  And critically, one woman was also good enough to recognize who had the best suggested move because she carefully considered and understood their analyses.  She couldn’t create every insightful move, but she could recognize them, and since she also earned the trust of the community, she converted individual insights into actionable collective insight.  She tapped into a network of microexperts.

In thinking about this idea in the context of health, I’m convinced that our next exponential leap in medical progress depends on us learning from networks of microexperts.  Today when I see patients, for example, I’m often not sure what the right diagnosis or treatment is.  I may look something up, ask a nearby colleague, or if I’m really unsure, I’ll refer the patient to someone more expert.  I often don’t do this because both the patient and I want a decision sooner and because the ‘expert’ is also imperfect.

Imagine if I summarized the question in a couple sentences +/- a photo, and it was immediately posed to 100 potential experts in my network, who are chosen on a per-question basis using a relatively simple algorithm that matches my question to their experience.  And I, like the woman on The World team, am a good enough generalist to know which microexpert has the most pertinent recommendation.  Building this system would require significant innovation in how groups of doctors collaborate, but from a technology perspective we could easily build this system today.  It’s clear to me that in ten years, I’ll look back on how I’m practicing medicine today, and be embarrassed at how often I settle for poorly informed decisions.

Patients, no surprise, have already begun to figure this out.  A well-functioning online patient community is a network of microexperts.  For example, a few might have a background in statistics and have learned how to interpret the results of clinical trials.  Others have the resources to travel to centers of excellence for their relatively rare cancer and bring back to the community what they learn.  Many of them read everything they can find, share potentially useful findings, ask each other questions, and discuss potential answers.  And the best communities have a few members who are skilled at recognizing key insights brought by those who happen to be the microexperts for a given question.  It’s time to learn more from networks of microexperts!

Worst Headache of My Life Becomes Lesson About Role of Story in Health

PUBLISHED ON  November 16, 2011

WRITTEN BY  Roni Zeiger

2 COMMENTS  Join the Discussion

SHARE THIS POST

This post and 5 minute video were published on ABC News yesterday and I want to share them with this community as well.

Three months ago, at the age of 40, I had a small bleed in my brain. My story is no more special than any of your stories, but I learned something important from it and I want to share it with you. I learned firsthand the difference between what a patient tells his doctors and what he tells his loved ones, and why it matters.

When I arrived at the emergency room, I knew what data my physicians needed, because I’m a physician. I knew they would write an official note that tells the story of the patient’s symptoms and why they sought care. This is called the History of Present Illness or HPI. As I gave the doctors my HPI, it went something like this:

“I was running hard on the treadmill at 5:15 p.m. when I suddenly got a headache. The headache was not relieved by rest and I noticed some neck stiffness. I had been feeling totally well until the headache started; no fever or other reason to suspect meningitis. Within 30 minutes I started vomiting and had sensitivity to light. At no time did I notice any numbness, weakness or other neurological problems.”

This is an excellent HPI: short and to the point. But the story I told my loved ones was different.

“I was running hard on the treadmill when I suddenly got a headache. It surprised me at first but I figured I was probably dehydrated. It didn’t go away after I rested for a few minutes and drank water. I noticed that my neck was stiff, but I knew it wasn’t meningitis because I felt great until the moment the headache started. You know, most doctors are taught that if a patient says “the worst headache of my life,” then it’s a subarachnoid hemorrhage until proven otherwise. That means a bleed in the brain, usually caused by a ruptured aneurysm. But I knew something like that couldn’t happen to me. And anyway, while I suppose technically this could be the worst headache of my life, it really wasn’t that bad. I mean, technically everyone has had the worst headache of their life, right?

“I took a shower and didn’t feel any better. Then I felt like throwing up. I didn’t have to, but had that feeling that letting it out would make me more comfortable. Throwing up didn’t help at all. I called my wife: ‘Hi babe, I was going to suggest that I pick up the kids from my parent’s house since I drove today, but actually, can you ask them to bring the kids home? I think I need you to be home when I get home, I’m feeling sick.’ The drive home was a battle to not throw up again, and boy, was the sunlight making my headache worse.

“I could barely say hello to my wife, went straight to lie down, to try to get comfortable. No luck. Where is that pain coming from? OK, I’m not in control anymore, I can’t be the doctor. I called my friend who was working in the urgent care. I started to explain but seconds later had to go throw up more. ‘Just come in, we’ll take care of you and figure out what’s going on,’ he said before I left the phone. My wife drove, I sat with a bucket between my legs. The retching was making my head hurt so much.

“An IV, nausea meds, pain meds. Ahh, finally I can think, I can unclench. ‘I feel a little silly saying this,’ I told my doctor friend, ‘but I think this is the worst headache of my life.’ ‘Yeah,’ he said, ‘we need to scan your head.’ Somehow I wasn’t worried. I’m… invincible. I’ve been in a CT scanner before, no big deal. After I went through once, the technician came back into the room and said, ‘We’re just going to run you through one more time.’ Oh sh**. They must have seen blood. All of a sudden I was alone in a CT scanner, in a big cold room. A few minutes later, one of the doctors walked in, looked me in the eye and said: ‘You have a subarachnoid.’

“Simultaneously, I had two thoughts: ‘Totally makes sense, this is a classic story for a subarachnoid hemorrhage,’ and ‘How could I possibly have a subarachnoid hemorrhage?!’ The symptoms leading up to it made perfect sense, except don’t people with a subarachnoid die on the spot or show up nearly comatose to the ER? What’s going to happen to my son, my daughter, my wife? I watched images of them as the ceiling rolled by above me on my ride back to the ER.

“My wife says I told her everything was going to be OK and that I looked like I believed it. Not too many minutes later, the neurosurgery team explained that this was indeed likely to be true. They had just reviewed the CT scan, and I was one of the 5-10 percent of people with a subarachnoid hemorrhage who bleed from a small vein, instead of an artery or arterial aneurysm, and typically suffer no long-term problems. Subsequent testing confirmed that I have no aneurysms and my chance of having another bleed is the same as any of yours.”

So my family and friends heard my story, not just my History of Present Illness. The HPI is brief, clinical, and effective. It told the doctors what they needed to know, but it was missing two important things.

First, it lacked humanity. Why didn’t I tell my doctors that I was scared, that I was worried about the future of my wife and children? Because that’s not what you say in a hospital, especially if you’re a doctor who knows “what’s relevant.” But it might have made me feel better to talk about it and it might have reminded my caregivers that I wasn’t just another diagnosis, but a husband and father. Carefully listening to patients’ stories can teach us what they understand, what they don’t understand, their preferences, their fears. This surfaces key un-asked questions and often improves trust and compliance with recommended treatment.

Second, I didn’t tell the doctors all of my symptoms and the events surrounding them. Without even thinking about it, I only told them what I thought was relevant. In fact, a common mistake we doctors make is getting too attached to the first diagnosis we think of, and then failing to ask about other symptoms, other clues. Patients and doctors should always spend an extra minute discussing concerns that the doctor may not have asked about. Doing so often leads to a faster and more accurate diagnosis. This is also why, in my own practice, I try to always ask the patient what they think is going on. You don’t have to be a doctor to have an insight or clue that can make all the difference.

Since my bleed, I’ve been thinking about how we can learn more from people’s stories — not just because it seems like the right thing to do — but in order to improve their care. I was discussing this with Gilles Frydman and ePatient Dave, and they pointed me to Lucien Engelen in the Netherlands, who is doing something about this, now with a little help from me. He just launched www.myhealthstory.me, where anyone (including you!) can contribute a video of their own health story. Medical students will curate them and Lucien’s team will lead research on how stories can improve the training and practice of doctors.

We start life learning from stories. We learn about our history, our culture from our parents and grandparents. As kids, we make up stories to explain our ideas and experiences. Those of us who have the privilege of going to medical school often find that our best clinical teachers are the ones who tell us stories of patients they have seen. And they teach us to elicit stories from our patients.

Indeed, many are drawn to medicine in the first place by great medical story tellers like Oliver Sacks and Abraham Verghese. They show us that with medicine, we can be data geeks and students of the humanities at the same time.

But at some point, we often lose a piece of our humanity during training, with its long hours, and short sleep. Many doctors, including me, can’t forget that night on call, when we actually wished Mr. Jones would hurry up and die, so that we could rest. Survival during medical training is all about efficiency and stories aren’t efficient. We learn to boil patients down and reduce them to facts and numbers. Mrs. Garcia, mother of 6 who came to this country to escape further oppression in Guatemala after losing her husband, becomes simply gallstone pancreatitis in room 318.

We see this codified in the jargon doctors use to organize a patient’s medical record. The History of Present Illness just doesn’t sound like a place to tell stories. And now we’re pushing doctors further from the patient’s story by asking them to use electronic medical records, which often make taking a medical history feel like filling out an endless series of forms.

We were born with stories and so was the practice of medicine. Technology is transforming our lives including letting us create and share stories in ways limited only by our imaginations. Now let’s innovate together to bring stories back into health care, so that we can better understand today’s most important questions and more efficiently discover their answers. I look forward to hearing your stories.

Follow me @rzeiger

No social network Rx? Malpractice!

PUBLISHED ON  October 14, 2010

WRITTEN BY  Roni Zeiger

5 COMMENTS  Join the Discussion

SHARE THIS POST

Because I’m a doctor and I know a lot of people in the health care space, people ask me all the time for referrals. A friend with a newly diagnosed autoimmune disease, a loved one with a terrifying cancer sentence – who should I talk to?? I used to depend on the amazing clinical colleagues I’ve worked with, and I still do (ongoing thanks to all of you!). But recent experience with a newly diagnosed relative, I realized: the place we turned immediately was a social network. An earlier version of me would have said to that, WTF? You’re going to have your relative talk to a bunch of people who dismiss science and spew anecdotes about which vortex in Arizona made them feel like their tumor was shrinking? The slightly wiser me responds: the patient is the most underutilized resource in medicine. No one has a stronger incentive to find out who is the best specialist, what is the latest randomized controlled study, than she whose life depends on it. Except maybe she whose son’s life depends on it. And these people are talking to each other.

(more…)

Should Patients Read Doctor’s Notes? Wrong Question.

PUBLISHED ON  August 17, 2010

WRITTEN BY  Roni Zeiger

20 COMMENTS  Join the Discussion

SHARE THIS POST

When you have a doctor’s appointment, and she makes some notes and later formalizes them for your medical record, would you like read them?  There’s been debate over the years about whether patients should read the notes that doctors write about them and their health issues — in academic circles, in a great Seinfeld episode where Elaine’s dermatologist won’t let her see what he wrote about her, and more recently in a New York Times piece that discusses the promising OpenNotes project.  I think this is the wrong question.  Instead, you should walk into your doctor’s office with a video camera or tape recorder.  More on that in a moment.

The discussion about doctor’s notes might seem silly, since for many years we’ve had the right to go the medical records department and get copies of our records.  So all we’re talking about here is making that more convenient, for example, by letting you log into your online account and see the notes there.  However, this is much more than convenience, it is a cultural statement: we, the doctors, should sincerely invite you to read our impressions, our thought processes, our decisions; and learn from them, even question them.  While this is a powerful statement, we’ve gotten distracted by this artifact, the doctor’s note.

Instead we should focus on the communication it represents.  The goal is not to sneak into the doctor’s inner thoughts and see what he’s really thinking about me, rather it is to gain a deeper understanding of my health and add a channel of communication from the doctor whose precious minutes just aren’t enough.  (By the way, to those who fear doctors will no longer be able to write what they *really* think, I have two comments.  First, patients can already request copies of their records, so be thoughtful in your notes!  Second, I would consider supporting a separate area for comments that the doctor sincerely feels are in the patient’s best interest not to see and are only for other clinicians, similar to what’s done today for mental health records.)

What we should be focusing on here are the best ways for the patient to understand and remember the doctor’s guidance, including the Q&A that typically happens during the visit.  The doctor’s note hardly addresses this.  It’s designed for the doctor to communicate to other clinicians who will later care for the patient, and in practice it’s increasingly full of not-so-useful information included for billing purposes.  Sometimes the doctor will create a separate note explaining the plan to the patient, especially if his EMR auto-generates a template for this.  But this is uncommon, and it provides only a brief summary of the outcome of the discussion.

I encourage loved ones to take a tape recorder or video camera to their doctor’s appointments, especially ones where new or critical issues will be discussed like whether or not to have surgery or how aggressive to be in treating a cancer.  Most of us have experienced how little one actually remembers when fear or stress levels are high.  Being able to review the conversation again later can make a huge difference in understanding and better decision making.

As a doctor, does it make me nervous when someone wants to record our conversation?  Yes.  Because it holds me even more accountable to communicating clearly and taking good care of my patients.

(This post was cross-posted on Huffington Post.)

Health Data is Useful… if it Informs Conversations

PUBLISHED ON  April 12, 2010

WRITTEN BY  Roni Zeiger

23 COMMENTS  Join the Discussion

SHARE THIS POST

At Health 2.0 in Paris last week, I said: “Data on its own is useless. It’s all about conversations.”  Let’s dig into this a bit more.

I’m a strong believer in evidence-based medicine.  We must learn from successes and failures, in particular those that come in the form of randomized clinical trials.  However, as I transitioned from my academic (and outstanding) residency training into clinical practice in the community, it became increasingly clear that we must make the majority of clinical decisions in the context of insufficient evidence.  And even when good evidence suggests a given course of treatment or testing, decisions often include complex pros and cons.  What should we do?

The answer, of course, is that we must have conversations.  The common goal of getting “the right information for the right person at the right time” is important, in particular because it allows us to have the right conversations.  Doctors must talk to their patients about the consequences of a false-positive mammogram and the risk of a perforated colon — and death — from colonoscopy.  Patients must talk to their doctors about how much they can reduce their risk of stroke or heart attack by taking various medications, exercising, and adjusting their diets.  Some of these decisions are straightforward, but most involve personal preferences about willingness to take medications, make lifestyle changes, and accept risks of side effects or risks of future illness.

In some cases, the choice is between an untreated deadly cancer and a hopefully-less-deadly cure.  Such cases underscore how important conversations are about data and preferences.  Over time, we will have more data from traditional clinical trials, from patients who share their well documented experiences with others, and from analysis of data in electronic medical record systems.  The addition of genetic information to these data sets reminds us that in some ways, every person represents a unique trial with a single participant.

We are lost without data, yet data alone cannot guide us.  The increasingly rich data about health provides context for an increasingly important set of conversations each of us must have about our health related decisions and those of our loved ones.  This is what Participatory Medicine is all about: conversations between pateints and doctors, between patients and patients… conversations among all of us working as colleagues to improve our health.

This post was cross-posted here on the Huffington Post blog.

The Biggest Wasted Resource in Health Care? You.

PUBLISHED ON  February 22, 2010

WRITTEN BY  Roni Zeiger

NO COMMENTS  Join the Discussion

SHARE THIS POST

A few weeks ago, a colleague at work took his baby to the doctor because she wasn’t quite behaving like herself. A few visits later, they hadn’t received a diagnosis, and the doctors suggested they wait at home for the girl to feel better. But the baby just wasn’t right and seemed to be getting worse.

So the two people with the biggest incentive to figure this out — her parents — decided to do their own research. They searched on the Web for their daughter’s symptoms, which included some drooping of her head and looking lethargic and weak. They noticed that “infant botulism” appeared in some of the search results, read about it and thought the descriptions fit just how their daughter was behaving.

They returned to the ER with this information in hand and the doctors agreed that this was probably infant botulism. She was admitted to the hospital, the diagnosis was confirmed, and she was soon getting the specialized treatment required for this often fatal disease.

This is not a story about doctors who should have made an obvious diagnosis. This diagnosis is quite hard, especially because botulism is exceedingly rare: There are only about 100 cases reported in the United States each year. This means most doctors will never see a case, and it’s difficult to think of a diagnosis you’ve never seen.

Indeed, I think the doctors did something terrific. They welcomed the family’s ideas about the diagnosis, the baby was hospitalized for only a few days and she has recovered fully. In most cases, the diagnosis isn’t made until paralysis from the botulism toxin has resulted in difficulty breathing and infants need ICU care and several weeks in the hospital.

The hospital staff told my colleague that this was the earliest case of infant botulism they’d seen.

This is a success story for “participatory” medicine, about patients who decide they need to be fully engaged co-pilots in their care, and doctors who welcome them into the cockpit.

So does this mean everyone should use the Web to guess their own diagnosis or most appropriate treatment, and present their findings to the doctor? Not necessarily. Nor does it mean that the Web is always an easy place to find the right answers.

Indeed, while the Internet may be especially useful for diagnosing rare diseases, it’s also easy to get frightened by serious illnesses when you search for symptoms of a common cold.

Patients as Free Labor

But this does mean we need to change some of our stereotypes. Doctors should welcome research done by patients, instead of the not uncommon reaction: “Oh, boy, here comes someone with printouts from the Internet. Now I have to convince them to stop worrying about everything they just read.”

Embracing patients who do their own research is more than just good bedside manner. It’s free labor.

You know what I do when I’m confused about a diagnosis when seeing a patient? I ask them what they think it is. Even though most cases aren’t like this dramatic case of infant botulism, this sometimes helps me with the diagnosis, and it almost always helps me understand what they’re worried about.

What better way to start a partnership?

An Important Thanksgiving Conversation

PUBLISHED ON  November 25, 2009

WRITTEN BY  Roni Zeiger

NO COMMENTS  Join the Discussion

SHARE THIS POST

Thanksgiving is a time to be with family and to remember and share how much we care about one another. A conversation we don’t typically have with mom, dad, brother, or sister is about our wishes at the end of life. As a doctor, I’ve witnessed many tragic occasions where a loved one may well have been treated quite differently than they wished at the end of their life, because the family just didn’t know what they wanted, and it was too late to ask.

This is the second annual “blog rally” to promote Engage With Grace – a movement aimed at having all of us understand and communicate our end-of-life wishes. First, a bit of humor for you to consider. Let’s think of it as a warm-up:

 

 

Now consider the five questions from Engage With Grace below. Think about them, document them, share them. Best wishes to you and yours for a holiday that’s fulfilling in all the right ways.

 

  • Page 1 of 2
  • 1
  • 2
  • >